Critique of the Concept of “People’s School” in Technology-Based Islamic Education According to Ki Hajar Dewantara

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67008/t16b8435

Keywords:

People's School; Islamic Education; Learning Technology; Ki Hajar Dewantara

Abstract

Freedom to Learn, as part of the national education reform agenda, encourages the use of learning technology, including in the development of the concept of "people's schools" aimed at equalizing access to education. However, in practice, educational digitalization is often understood as merely a technical and administrative adaptation, potentially obscuring humanistic values ​​in Islamic education. This study aims to critique the concept of "people's schools" in technology-based Islamic education through the perspective of Ki Hajar Dewantara's thought. This study uses a literature study method with a qualitative-philosophical approach, examining Ki Hajar Dewantara's works, Islamic education literature, and recent studies on learning technology and the Freedom to Learn policy. The research gap in this study lies in the lack of studies that combine Ki Hajar Dewantara's philosophical critique with the practice of "people's school" digitalization in the context of Islamic education. The novelty of this research lies in positioning learning technology not merely as an instrument of digital innovation, but as an ethical-pedagogical tool for humanizing people and realizing liberating education. The formulation of the problem in this study includes: (1) how the concept of people's schools in technology-based Islamic education is viewed from the thoughts of Ki Hajar Dewantara, and (2) why the digitalization of education has the potential to reduce the substantive meaning of Freedom to Learn. The results of the study indicate that the practice of technology-based people's schools tends to be instrumental and adaptive to the development of the times, but is not yet fully in line with the principles of among, the nature of nature, and the nature of the times which emphasize independence, character formation, and critical awareness of students, so that the integration of technology in Islamic education demands an orientation of humanization and liberation, not just learning efficiency.

References

Abdillah, F. (2024). Konsep Pendidikan Menurut Ki Hadjar Dewantara Dan Tantanganya Di Era Milennial. EDUCARE: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kesehatan, 1(2), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.70437/jedu.v1i2.4

admin. (2023, October 10). Sejarah Sekolah Rakyat di Indonesia. Museum Pendidikan Nasional. https://museumpendidikannasional.upi.edu/sejarah-sekolah-rakyat-di-indonesia/

Alonso, R. K., Vélez, A., Martínez-Monteagudo, M. C., & Rico-González, M. (2023). Flipped Learning in Higher Education for the Development of Intrinsic Motivation: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121226

Amnur, M., Safitri, A. H., Sari, H. P., & Hasani, S. (2025). Dehumanisasi Teknologi dan Tantangan Pendidikan Islam: Sebuah Tinjauan Filosofis. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Education and Local Culture, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.22437/ijielc.v3i2.49567

Anam, K., Maimun, M., & Holik, A. (2025). Pendidikan Islam Dalam Sekolah Rakyat (SR): Institusi Pendidikan Yang Dikelola Pemerintah Pada Masa Kolonial. JURNAL LENTERA : Kajian Keagamaan, Keilmuan Dan Teknologi, 24(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.29138/lentera.v24i1.643

Arikunto, S. (2010). Metode peneltian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 173.

Aulia, D. N., Fadilah, A. D., Syakura, F. M., Adiasta, M. A., & Nurdin, N. (2025). Merdeka Belajar di Tengah Ketimpangan: Tantangan dan Harapan bagi Pendidikan Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 9(1), 55–61.

Baidowi, A., Ahyat, N., & Noer, M. F. (2025). Konsep Sekolah Rakyat Dalam Perspektif Ki Hajar Dewantara. Risda: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pendidikan Islam, 11(2). https://ejournal.staiarrosyid.ac.id/index.php/risda

Biesta, G. (2020). Risking Ourselves in Education: Qualification, Socialization, and Subjectification Revisited. Educational Theory, 70(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12411

Bungin, B. (2007). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif: Aktualisasi metodologis ke arah ragam varian kontemporer.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE.

Dianingsig, D., Nurkhasanah, N., Anisah, R., Harni, H., & Soedjono, S. (2024). Analisis Implikasi Konsep Sistem Among Dan Trikon Pendidikan Ki Hajar Dewantara di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Jurnal Inovatif Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 3(2), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.38073/jimpi.v3i2.1661

Erlangga, I. S., Tarigan, F. P. P., Ternasih, L., & Umar, D. (2024). Digital Transformation in Education: Challenges and Opportunities in the Modern Era. International Journal of Teaching and Learning, 2(12), 3251~3260-3251~3260.

Garuda—Garba Rujukan Digital. (n.d.). Retrieved January 3, 2026, from https://garuda.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/documents/detail/4701696

Hidayat, M. Y. (2022). Konsep Trilogi Pendidikan Menurut Ki Hajar Dewantara dan Relevansinya Dengan Pendidikan di Era Teknologi Informasi [Thesis, Universitas Islam Indonesia]. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/39705

Huberman, M., & Miles, M. B. (1992). Analisis data kualitatif. Penerbit Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.

Huda, M., & Hidayah, R. (2024). Paradigma Bimbingan Konseling dalam Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal konseling gusjigang, 10(1), 30-39. https://doi.org/10.24176/jkg.v10i1.12322

Huda, M., & Slamet, S. (2024). Mental Health Concept in Islamic Education. International Journal of Educatio Elementaria and Psychologia, 1(3), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.70177/ijeep.v1i3.1092

Ibnu, K. I. M., & Kurniawan, T. (2025). Implementasi Kebijakan Program Sekolah Rakyat Kementerian Sosial RI (Studi Kasus: Sekolah Rakyat Menengah Atas 10 Jakarta Selatan). Sosio Konsepsia: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.33007/ska.v15i1.3739

Indrasari, M., Wajdi, M. B. N., Prasnowo, M. A., Pamuji, E., Winarko, B., & Fatadona, H. (2024). The Digitalization Policy in the Education Sector: Innovation and Adaptation. Journal of Social Political Sciences, 5(3), 236–251. https://doi.org/10.52166/jsps.v5i3.241

Irma, I. (2025). Transformasi Pendidikan Melalui Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi. TEKNOS: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Teknologi, 3(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.59638/teknos.v3i1.521

Mangunwibawa, A. A., Hakim, S. A., & Sari, Z. (2025). Transformasi Pendidikan Indonesia: Sintesis Pemikiran dan Praksis KH Ahmad Dahlan dan Ki Hajar Dewantara dalam Era Digital. Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah, 25(3), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.31599/tjdnv943

Moleong, L. (2010). Metode peneltian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. http://a-research.upi.edu/operator/upload/t_pd_0704893_chapter3.pdf

Muin, M. (2025, May 6). Infografis Prabowo bakal Buka 100 Sekolah Rakyat Berasrama. iNews.ID. https://www.inews.id/multimedia/infografis/infografis-prabowo-bakal-buka-100-sekolah-rakyat-berasrama

Prastiwi, D. C., Putri, N. M., Hidayatullah, A., & Arfian. (2024). Meningkatkan Keterampilan Sosio-Emosional Melalui Program PATHS Pada Anak Usia Dini di Sekolah Rakyat Bekasi. Inaba Journal Of Psychology, 2(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.56956/ijop.v2i1.393

Rafid, R., Nurita, R. F., & Dores, D. (2025a). Public schools and critical education: Alternative education policy in Indonesia. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 6(1), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v6i1.3321

Rafid, R., Nurita, R. F., & Dores, D. (2025b). Public schools and critical education: Alternative education policy in Indonesia. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 6(1), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v6i1.3321

Rokhimawan, M. A. (2013). Pembelajaran Sains di MI untuk Membentuk Peserta Didik yang Humanistik Religius. Al-Bidayah, 5(2), 284526. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-bidayah.v5i2.76

Rosyidah, S., Supriyanto, A., & Mustiningsih. (2025). Pengaruh Integrasi Teknologi dalam Pembelajaran Terhadap Kompetensi Pedagogi Digital Guru SMP. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 12(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2025.v12.i1.p105-120

Selwyn, N. (2011). Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates. A&C Black.

Sulistyaningrum, F., Radiana, U., & Ratnawati, R. E. (2023). Filsafat Pendidikan Ki Hajar Dewantara sebagai Landasan Pendidik di Era Digital. EDUKASIA Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(2), 2331–2336. https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v4i2.538

Suprihatin, S. (2017). Pendekatan Humanistik Dalam Pengembangan Kurikulum Pendidikan Agama Islam. POTENSIA: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 3(1), 82–104. https://doi.org/10.24014/potensia.v3i1.3477

Wibowo, Y. R., Salfadilah, F., Amanabella, M., Malahati, F., & Atin, S. (2024). The Concept of Humanist Education: A Qur’anic Perspective. Bestari, 21(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.36667/bestari.v21i1.1558

Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: Digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641

Downloads

Published

2026-07-13

How to Cite

Critique of the Concept of “People’s School” in Technology-Based Islamic Education According to Ki Hajar Dewantara. (2026). Journal of Science and Research, 2(1), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.67008/t16b8435